Jane Brockington VCGLR subpoenaed to give evidence she is protecting corrupt employee Adam Toma
Jane
Brockington is stepping aside from the VCGLR on the 24th March 2014
just in time to give evidence on the 28 th March 2014 .
Clearly there is no integrity to this skank who protects corruption and fraud.
Wednesday 5 March 2014
Monday 3 March 2014
Commonwealth Director of Prosecution considering how to protect Fraud and corruption in Government Departments
From: Stephen.Grodzicki@cdpp.gov.au
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: REASONABLE PEOPLE S474.17 [DLM=Sensitive:Legal]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:38:41 +0000
To: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: REASONABLE PEOPLE S474.17 [DLM=Sensitive:Legal]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:38:41 +0000
Sensitive: Legal
Dear Ms Brown,
I am not permitted to give you any legal advice about the meaning of “reasonable persons”.
I advise that I will be seeking an adjournment at the call over tomorrow until Friday 7.3.14, to carefully consider whether these charges ought to proceed further.
Many thanks,
Stephen Grodzicki
A/ Principal Legal Officer | Prosecutions (3)
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Sydney Office
T: 02 9321 1111 | F: 9321 1351 | E: Stephen.Grodzicki@cdpp.gov.aup
CDPP considering defeat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Clearly it is a very sad evening for me when I receive an Email from the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecution that they are considering defeat!!!!!
Considering the AFSA and the shonks at the Australian Federal Police tried their very best to fuck me over there is only one thing left for them all to do.............................
Come kiss my fucking ARSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: stephen.grodzicki@cdpp.gov.au
Subject: Considering defeat?
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:04:52 +1100
Clearly it is a very sad evening for me when I receive an Email from the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecution that they are considering defeat!!!!!
Considering the AFSA and the shonks at the Australian Federal Police tried their very best to fuck me over there is only one thing left for them all to do.............................
Come kiss my fucking ARSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: stephen.grodzicki@cdpp.gov.au
Subject: Considering defeat?
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:04:52 +1100
Hi Stephen,
please don't drop the charges against me because it will clearly spoil all the fun I am going to have cross examining all the shonky staff at the the Australian Financial Security Commission and exposing systemic corrupt conduct at the Commonwealth Ombudsman , the Australian Public Service Commission and the Australian Federal Police.
As you are aware this matter was an abuse of power and malicious prosecution you will also be aware that these Government Agencies will still face the difficulties of being exposed on the internet should you consider defeat is your preferred option.
Thank you
Fiona Brown
Saturday 1 March 2014
Search Warrants/ shonky Magistrates and shonky documents!!!
+Top of Form
CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 255
Issue of search warrants (1) If, on the application of a police officer, a magistrate is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe—
(a) that an offence to which this Act applies has been, or is intended to be, committed; and
(b) that there is in any premises an object relevant to the investigation of that offence;
the magistrate may issue a search warrant in respect of those premises.
(2) An application for the issue of a search warrant may be made either personally or by telephone.
(3) The grounds of an application for a search warrant shall be verified by affidavit.
(4) An application for the issue of a search warrant shall not be made by telephone unless in the opinion of the applicant a search warrant is urgently required and there is insufficient time to make the application personally.
(5) If an application for the issue of a search warrant is made by telephone—
(a) the applicant shall inform the magistrate of his or her name and of his or her rank and number in the police force, and the magistrate, on receiving that information, is entitled to assume, without further inquiry, that the applicant is a police officer; and
(b) the applicant shall inform the magistrate of the grounds on which he or she seeks the issue of the search warrant; and
(c) if it appears to the magistrate from the information given by the applicant that there are proper grounds for the issue of a search warrant—he or she shall inform the applicant of the facts on which he or she relies as grounds for the issue of the warrant, and shall not proceed to issue the warrant unless the applicant undertakes to make an affidavit verifying those facts; and
(d) if the applicant gives the undertaking—the magistrate may then make out, and sign, a search warrant, noting on the warrant the facts on which he or she relies as grounds for the issue of the warrant; and
(e) the search warrant shall be deemed to have been issued, and shall come into force, when signed by the magistrate; and
(f) the magistrate shall inform the applicant of the terms of the warrant; and
(g) the applicant shall, as soon as practicable after the issue of the warrant, forward to the magistrate an affidavit verifying the facts referred to in paragraph (c).
(6) A magistrate by whom a search warrant is issued shall file the warrant, or a copy of the warrant, and the affidavit verifying the grounds on which the application for the warrant was made, in the Magistrates Court.
(a) that an offence to which this Act applies has been, or is intended to be, committed; and
(b) that there is in any premises an object relevant to the investigation of that offence;
the magistrate may issue a search warrant in respect of those premises.
(2) An application for the issue of a search warrant may be made either personally or by telephone.
(3) The grounds of an application for a search warrant shall be verified by affidavit.
(4) An application for the issue of a search warrant shall not be made by telephone unless in the opinion of the applicant a search warrant is urgently required and there is insufficient time to make the application personally.
(5) If an application for the issue of a search warrant is made by telephone—
(a) the applicant shall inform the magistrate of his or her name and of his or her rank and number in the police force, and the magistrate, on receiving that information, is entitled to assume, without further inquiry, that the applicant is a police officer; and
(b) the applicant shall inform the magistrate of the grounds on which he or she seeks the issue of the search warrant; and
(c) if it appears to the magistrate from the information given by the applicant that there are proper grounds for the issue of a search warrant—he or she shall inform the applicant of the facts on which he or she relies as grounds for the issue of the warrant, and shall not proceed to issue the warrant unless the applicant undertakes to make an affidavit verifying those facts; and
(d) if the applicant gives the undertaking—the magistrate may then make out, and sign, a search warrant, noting on the warrant the facts on which he or she relies as grounds for the issue of the warrant; and
(e) the search warrant shall be deemed to have been issued, and shall come into force, when signed by the magistrate; and
(f) the magistrate shall inform the applicant of the terms of the warrant; and
(g) the applicant shall, as soon as practicable after the issue of the warrant, forward to the magistrate an affidavit verifying the facts referred to in paragraph (c).
(6) A magistrate by whom a search warrant is issued shall file the warrant, or a copy of the warrant, and the affidavit verifying the grounds on which the application for the warrant was made, in the Magistrates Court.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)