Mathew Osborne Principal Legal Officer at ITSA is telling staff at ITSA that S134(3) allows them to breach the Bankruptcy Act.
Donkey.. it only applies to property not the entire Act........... WHAT the F..K... he never thought he would get caught!!!
Why is Veronique Ingram Inspector General covering for him???????????
Why is Robert McClelland the Attorney General covering for Veronique Ingram????
What are they all hiding?????
Sunday, 23 October 2011
Saturday, 22 October 2011
Commonwealth Ombudsman/Commonwealth Ombudsman Scam
Alison Larkins is unfit to hold the position of Commonwealth Ombudsman. Why is she concealing misconduct in Government departments????
Julie Padgett NSW Manager BFI
JULIE PADGETT/NSW BFI Manager ITSA
So now you can read about yourself and the scam at ITSA... Remember you idiot, I have all my evidence in writing.
Did you think all my conversations with you were just polite ... you stupid fool........... I was told to get the necessary evidence on you by the solicitors.
So now you can read about yourself and the scam at ITSA... Remember you idiot, I have all my evidence in writing.
Did you think all my conversations with you were just polite ... you stupid fool........... I was told to get the necessary evidence on you by the solicitors.
Section 19 of the Bankruptcy Act says
(i) referring to the Inspector-General or to relevant law enforcement authorities any evidence of an offence by the bankrupt against this Act; Refer to Inspector Generals Practice statement 14 Failure to refer is a breach of the Bankruptcy Act. I don't give a F..K that the principal Legal Officer Mathew Osborne is telling you to breach it using S134(3) This only refers to property you arrogant donkey!!!! |
Thursday, 6 October 2011
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
Why is the Commonwealth Ombudsman covering up the misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act at ITSA??? You idiots ... ITSA cannot use section 134(3) to justify misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act....
Why do we have a donkey as head of the Commonwealth Ombudsman anyway?????
Why do we have a donkey as head of the Commonwealth Ombudsman anyway?????
BANKRUPTCY ACT 1966 - SECT 134
Powers exercisable at discretion of trustee [see Table B] (1) Subject to this Act, the trustee may do all or any of the following things:
(a) sell all or any part of the property of the bankrupt;
(aa) accept, without terms or conditions, or subject to terms and conditions, a sum of money payable at a future time as the consideration or part of the consideration for the sale of any property of the bankrupt;
(ac) divide among the creditors, in its existing form and according to its estimated value, property that, by reason of its peculiar nature or other special circumstances, cannot readily or advantageously be sold;
(b) carry on a business of the bankrupt so far as may be necessary to dispose of it or wind it up for the benefit of creditors;
(c) postpone the winding-up of the estate;
(da) mortgage or charge any of the property of the bankrupt for the purpose of raising money for the payment of the debts provable in the bankruptcy;
(f) make a compromise with a creditor or a person claiming to be a creditor in respect of a debt provable, or claimed to be provable, in the bankruptcy;
(g) make a compromise in respect of any claim arising out of the administration of the estate of the bankrupt, whether the claim is made by or against the trustee;
(h) deal with property to which the bankrupt is beneficially entitled as tenant in tail in the same manner as the bankrupt could deal with it if he or she were not a bankrupt;
(i) obtain such advice or assistance as he or she considers desirable relating to the administration of the estate or to the conduct or affairs of the bankrupt;
(ia) refer any dispute to arbitration;
(j) bring, institute or defend any action or other legal proceeding relating to the administration of the estate;
(k) execute powers of attorney, deeds or other instruments for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this Act into effect; and
(m) employ the bankrupt:
(i) to superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(iii) to assist in any other way in administering the property of the bankrupt;
and, in consideration of the bankrupt's services, make such allowance to the bankrupt out of the estate as the trustee considers reasonable;
(ma) make such allowance out of the estate as he or she thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse or de facto partner of the bankrupt or the family of the bankrupt;
Note: See also subsection 5(6).
(n) superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(o) administer the property of the bankrupt in any other way.
(1A) An allowance made to the bankrupt in pursuance of paragraph (1)(m) may be reduced by the Court upon the application of an interested person.
(3) Subject to this Act, the trustee may use his or her own discretion in the administration of the estate.
(4) The trustee may at any time apply to the Court for directions in respect of a matter arising in connexion with the administration of the estate.
Note: Section 178 allows an application to be made to the Court by the bankrupt, a creditor or any other person who is affected by an act, omission or decision of the trustee.
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
Why are the Donkeys at bankruptcy Regulations using S134(3) to justify misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act??? you stupid idiots this section does not apply....
BANKRUPTCY ACT 1966 - SECT 134
Powers exercisable at discretion of trustee [see Table B] (1) Subject to this Act, the trustee may do all or any of the following things:
(a) sell all or any part of the property of the bankrupt;
(aa) accept, without terms or conditions, or subject to terms and conditions, a sum of money payable at a future time as the consideration or part of the consideration for the sale of any property of the bankrupt;
(ac) divide among the creditors, in its existing form and according to its estimated value, property that, by reason of its peculiar nature or other special circumstances, cannot readily or advantageously be sold;
(b) carry on a business of the bankrupt so far as may be necessary to dispose of it or wind it up for the benefit of creditors;
(c) postpone the winding-up of the estate;
(da) mortgage or charge any of the property of the bankrupt for the purpose of raising money for the payment of the debts provable in the bankruptcy;
(f) make a compromise with a creditor or a person claiming to be a creditor in respect of a debt provable, or claimed to be provable, in the bankruptcy;
(g) make a compromise in respect of any claim arising out of the administration of the estate of the bankrupt, whether the claim is made by or against the trustee;
(h) deal with property to which the bankrupt is beneficially entitled as tenant in tail in the same manner as the bankrupt could deal with it if he or she were not a bankrupt;
(i) obtain such advice or assistance as he or she considers desirable relating to the administration of the estate or to the conduct or affairs of the bankrupt;
(ia) refer any dispute to arbitration;
(j) bring, institute or defend any action or other legal proceeding relating to the administration of the estate;
(k) execute powers of attorney, deeds or other instruments for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this Act into effect; and
(m) employ the bankrupt:
(i) to superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(iii) to assist in any other way in administering the property of the bankrupt;
and, in consideration of the bankrupt's services, make such allowance to the bankrupt out of the estate as the trustee considers reasonable;
(ma) make such allowance out of the estate as he or she thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse or de facto partner of the bankrupt or the family of the bankrupt;
Note: See also subsection 5(6).
(n) superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(o) administer the property of the bankrupt in any other way.
(1A) An allowance made to the bankrupt in pursuance of paragraph (1)(m) may be reduced by the Court upon the application of an interested person.
(3) Subject to this Act, the trustee may use his or her own discretion in the administration of the estate.
(4) The trustee may at any time apply to the Court for directions in respect of a matter arising in connexion with the administration of the estate.
Note: Section 178 allows an application to be made to the Court by the bankrupt, a creditor or any other person who is affected by an act, omission or decision of the trustee.
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
Mark Findlay and Adam Toma bankruptcy Regulation are using S134(3) to justify misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act,,, you idiots it does not apply... it only refers to property... it does not give the trustee discretion to breach the entire Act.....
BANKRUPTCY ACT 1966 - SECT 134
Powers exercisable at discretion of trustee [see Table B] (1) Subject to this Act, the trustee may do all or any of the following things:
(a) sell all or any part of the property of the bankrupt;
(aa) accept, without terms or conditions, or subject to terms and conditions, a sum of money payable at a future time as the consideration or part of the consideration for the sale of any property of the bankrupt;
(ac) divide among the creditors, in its existing form and according to its estimated value, property that, by reason of its peculiar nature or other special circumstances, cannot readily or advantageously be sold;
(b) carry on a business of the bankrupt so far as may be necessary to dispose of it or wind it up for the benefit of creditors;
(c) postpone the winding-up of the estate;
(da) mortgage or charge any of the property of the bankrupt for the purpose of raising money for the payment of the debts provable in the bankruptcy;
(f) make a compromise with a creditor or a person claiming to be a creditor in respect of a debt provable, or claimed to be provable, in the bankruptcy;
(g) make a compromise in respect of any claim arising out of the administration of the estate of the bankrupt, whether the claim is made by or against the trustee;
(h) deal with property to which the bankrupt is beneficially entitled as tenant in tail in the same manner as the bankrupt could deal with it if he or she were not a bankrupt;
(i) obtain such advice or assistance as he or she considers desirable relating to the administration of the estate or to the conduct or affairs of the bankrupt;
(ia) refer any dispute to arbitration;
(j) bring, institute or defend any action or other legal proceeding relating to the administration of the estate;
(k) execute powers of attorney, deeds or other instruments for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this Act into effect; and
(m) employ the bankrupt:
(i) to superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(iii) to assist in any other way in administering the property of the bankrupt;
and, in consideration of the bankrupt's services, make such allowance to the bankrupt out of the estate as the trustee considers reasonable;
(ma) make such allowance out of the estate as he or she thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse or de facto partner of the bankrupt or the family of the bankrupt;
Note: See also subsection 5(6).
(n) superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(o) administer the property of the bankrupt in any other way.
(1A) An allowance made to the bankrupt in pursuance of paragraph (1)(m) may be reduced by the Court upon the application of an interested person.
(3) Subject to this Act, the trustee may use his or her own discretion in the administration of the estate.
(4) The trustee may at any time apply to the Court for directions in respect of a matter arising in connexion with the administration of the estate.
Note: Section 178 allows an application to be made to the Court by the bankrupt, a creditor or any other person who is affected by an act, omission or decision of the trustee.
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
Mark Findlay is using the following section to justify misconduct and breaches...... Mark Findlay you donkey it does not apply... this only applies to property
BANKRUPTCY ACT 1966 - SECT 134
Powers exercisable at discretion of trustee [see Table B] (1) Subject to this Act, the trustee may do all or any of the following things:
(a) sell all or any part of the property of the bankrupt;
(aa) accept, without terms or conditions, or subject to terms and conditions, a sum of money payable at a future time as the consideration or part of the consideration for the sale of any property of the bankrupt;
(ac) divide among the creditors, in its existing form and according to its estimated value, property that, by reason of its peculiar nature or other special circumstances, cannot readily or advantageously be sold;
(b) carry on a business of the bankrupt so far as may be necessary to dispose of it or wind it up for the benefit of creditors;
(c) postpone the winding-up of the estate;
(da) mortgage or charge any of the property of the bankrupt for the purpose of raising money for the payment of the debts provable in the bankruptcy;
(f) make a compromise with a creditor or a person claiming to be a creditor in respect of a debt provable, or claimed to be provable, in the bankruptcy;
(g) make a compromise in respect of any claim arising out of the administration of the estate of the bankrupt, whether the claim is made by or against the trustee;
(h) deal with property to which the bankrupt is beneficially entitled as tenant in tail in the same manner as the bankrupt could deal with it if he or she were not a bankrupt;
(i) obtain such advice or assistance as he or she considers desirable relating to the administration of the estate or to the conduct or affairs of the bankrupt;
(ia) refer any dispute to arbitration;
(j) bring, institute or defend any action or other legal proceeding relating to the administration of the estate;
(k) execute powers of attorney, deeds or other instruments for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this Act into effect; and
(m) employ the bankrupt:
(i) to superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(iii) to assist in any other way in administering the property of the bankrupt;
and, in consideration of the bankrupt's services, make such allowance to the bankrupt out of the estate as the trustee considers reasonable;
(ma) make such allowance out of the estate as he or she thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse or de facto partner of the bankrupt or the family of the bankrupt;
Note: See also subsection 5(6).
(n) superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(o) administer the property of the bankrupt in any other way.
(1A) An allowance made to the bankrupt in pursuance of paragraph (1)(m) may be reduced by the Court upon the application of an interested person.
(3) Subject to this Act, the trustee may use his or her own discretion in the administration of the estate.
(4) The trustee may at any time apply to the Court for directions in respect of a matter arising in connexion with the administration of the estate.
Note: Section 178 allows an application to be made to the Court by the bankrupt, a creditor or any other person who is affected by an act, omission or decision of the trustee.
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
The donkeys at Bankruptcy Regulations are using the following section to justify Misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act..... You idiots it does not apply!!!!
BANKRUPTCY ACT 1966 - SECT 134
Powers exercisable at discretion of trustee [see Table B] (1) Subject to this Act, the trustee may do all or any of the following things:
(a) sell all or any part of the property of the bankrupt;
(aa) accept, without terms or conditions, or subject to terms and conditions, a sum of money payable at a future time as the consideration or part of the consideration for the sale of any property of the bankrupt;
(ac) divide among the creditors, in its existing form and according to its estimated value, property that, by reason of its peculiar nature or other special circumstances, cannot readily or advantageously be sold;
(b) carry on a business of the bankrupt so far as may be necessary to dispose of it or wind it up for the benefit of creditors;
(c) postpone the winding-up of the estate;
(da) mortgage or charge any of the property of the bankrupt for the purpose of raising money for the payment of the debts provable in the bankruptcy;
(f) make a compromise with a creditor or a person claiming to be a creditor in respect of a debt provable, or claimed to be provable, in the bankruptcy;
(g) make a compromise in respect of any claim arising out of the administration of the estate of the bankrupt, whether the claim is made by or against the trustee;
(h) deal with property to which the bankrupt is beneficially entitled as tenant in tail in the same manner as the bankrupt could deal with it if he or she were not a bankrupt;
(i) obtain such advice or assistance as he or she considers desirable relating to the administration of the estate or to the conduct or affairs of the bankrupt;
(ia) refer any dispute to arbitration;
(j) bring, institute or defend any action or other legal proceeding relating to the administration of the estate;
(k) execute powers of attorney, deeds or other instruments for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this Act into effect; and
(m) employ the bankrupt:
(i) to superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(iii) to assist in any other way in administering the property of the bankrupt;
and, in consideration of the bankrupt's services, make such allowance to the bankrupt out of the estate as the trustee considers reasonable;
(ma) make such allowance out of the estate as he or she thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse or de facto partner of the bankrupt or the family of the bankrupt;
Note: See also subsection 5(6).
(n) superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;
(o) administer the property of the bankrupt in any other way.
(1A) An allowance made to the bankrupt in pursuance of paragraph (1)(m) may be reduced by the Court upon the application of an interested person.
(3) Subject to this Act, the trustee may use his or her own discretion in the administration of the estate.
(4) The trustee may at any time apply to the Court for directions in respect of a matter arising in connexion with the administration of the estate.
Note: Section 178 allows an application to be made to the Court by the bankrupt, a creditor or any other person who is affected by an act, omission or decision of the trustee.
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
SENATOR SCOTT RYAN
This is for Nathan the Donkey at senator Ryan's Office.
I confirm I spoke to you at Parliament House on the 21st September around 5pm. You told me you would get back to me within a week. Instead you went on holidays. Last Wednesday I spoke to the receptionist who was extremely rude. Unfortunately I did not record the conversation., so please shut your mouth as you were not present.
At the time I spoke to you at parliament you were very interested in my evidence. Now you are not.
It therefore would be reasonable to assume Senator Ryan in his position in the Finance Committee has something to hide. Why is Senator Ryan protecting a Government Agency when he is aware to the gross misconduct occurring? What has Senator Ryan got to gain from this??
EMAIL SENT TO SENATOR RYAN 22.09.2011
: Dear Senator,
I confirm I rang your office yesterday. I understand you chair a committee at Estimates.
Please excuse some of my ignorance as I am a florist so I fail to understand a lot of processes in Parliament.
I have evidence of what is occuring a ITSA( Bankruptcy). Any inquiry or committee looking into the Bankruptcy Act is wasting their time unless you understand what is occurring at the very core of ITSA. Never , ever will anyone extract what is being advised by the Principal Legal Officer in Canberra.
Itsa is using S134(3) to justify and misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act.This section actually reffers to property, however ITSA is using it out of context and applying it to the entire Act.
The problem is not with the Act it is how it is being implemented and manipulated by Senior Management. Any complaints are covered up by Bankruptcy Regulation. They are using s134(3) to justify everything. This section refers only to property and the discretion that a trusttee has. Itsa is taking it to a new level and apply discretion to the entire Act. This is why there are so few people prosecuted under the Bankruptcy Act because Itsa are not referring them because are using this section to breach the Bankruptcy Act. This section is also used for senior Management to mislead creditors and assist bankrupts to fail to meet their obligations under the Bankruptcy Act. This opens whole field for corruption.
Any complaints are being covered up by Bankruptcy Regulations ,so instead of things ever improving they are infact becoming worse. The commonwealth Ombudsman only investigating 20% of complaints about ITSA. There will never be transperency while this section is being used.
I have had a quick look at ASIC and I can see a mine field there also.
As I already have said I am only a florist but I have had advice by the solicitors at the Sydney Markets what questions to ask and how to collect and confirm all my evidence.
To improve the Bankruptcy Act Bankruptcy Regulations must be removed, never ever will they tell any inquiry what is happening. They have covered up too much over the years and to admit any liability would have a cause extreme embarrassement.
I am sure ASIC would be using a similar clause to justify misconduct and breaches of the Act that they administer.
Thnking you for reading this,
Fiona Brown
I confirm I spoke to you at Parliament House on the 21st September around 5pm. You told me you would get back to me within a week. Instead you went on holidays. Last Wednesday I spoke to the receptionist who was extremely rude. Unfortunately I did not record the conversation., so please shut your mouth as you were not present.
At the time I spoke to you at parliament you were very interested in my evidence. Now you are not.
It therefore would be reasonable to assume Senator Ryan in his position in the Finance Committee has something to hide. Why is Senator Ryan protecting a Government Agency when he is aware to the gross misconduct occurring? What has Senator Ryan got to gain from this??
EMAIL SENT TO SENATOR RYAN 22.09.2011
: Dear Senator,
I confirm I rang your office yesterday. I understand you chair a committee at Estimates.
Please excuse some of my ignorance as I am a florist so I fail to understand a lot of processes in Parliament.
I have evidence of what is occuring a ITSA( Bankruptcy). Any inquiry or committee looking into the Bankruptcy Act is wasting their time unless you understand what is occurring at the very core of ITSA. Never , ever will anyone extract what is being advised by the Principal Legal Officer in Canberra.
Itsa is using S134(3) to justify and misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act.This section actually reffers to property, however ITSA is using it out of context and applying it to the entire Act.
The problem is not with the Act it is how it is being implemented and manipulated by Senior Management. Any complaints are covered up by Bankruptcy Regulation. They are using s134(3) to justify everything. This section refers only to property and the discretion that a trusttee has. Itsa is taking it to a new level and apply discretion to the entire Act. This is why there are so few people prosecuted under the Bankruptcy Act because Itsa are not referring them because are using this section to breach the Bankruptcy Act. This section is also used for senior Management to mislead creditors and assist bankrupts to fail to meet their obligations under the Bankruptcy Act. This opens whole field for corruption.
Any complaints are being covered up by Bankruptcy Regulations ,so instead of things ever improving they are infact becoming worse. The commonwealth Ombudsman only investigating 20% of complaints about ITSA. There will never be transperency while this section is being used.
I have had a quick look at ASIC and I can see a mine field there also.
As I already have said I am only a florist but I have had advice by the solicitors at the Sydney Markets what questions to ask and how to collect and confirm all my evidence.
To improve the Bankruptcy Act Bankruptcy Regulations must be removed, never ever will they tell any inquiry what is happening. They have covered up too much over the years and to admit any liability would have a cause extreme embarrassement.
I am sure ASIC would be using a similar clause to justify misconduct and breaches of the Act that they administer.
Thnking you for reading this,
Fiona Brown
Sunday, 2 October 2011
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
Why is the Commonwealth Ombudsman covering up the scam at ITSA by Mark Findlay and Veronique Ingram???
BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS
Why is Bankruptcy Regulations Mark Findlay and Adam Toma covering up the scam at ITSA by Senior Management??
Friday, 30 September 2011
Insolvency Trustee Service Australia
Mark Findlay covers-up and conceals Misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act at the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia
Thursday, 29 September 2011
Bankruptcy
Mark Findlay covers up misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act by senior staff at ITSA!!!
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Bankruptcy
Mathew Osborne (Legal Officer at ITSA)advises staff at ITSA to breach the Bankruptcy Act!!!!!!!
bankruptcy Scam
Bankruptcy Regulations (Adam Toma)coverup misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act at ITSA!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)