SENATOR SCOTT RYAN

This is for  Nathan the Donkey at senator Ryan's Office.
 I confirm I spoke to  you at Parliament House on the 21st September around 5pm. You told me you would get back to me within a week. Instead you went on holidays. Last Wednesday I spoke to the receptionist who was extremely rude. Unfortunately I did not record the conversation., so please shut your mouth  as you  were not present.
At the time I spoke to you at parliament you were very interested in my evidence. Now you are not.
It therefore would be reasonable to assume  Senator Ryan in his position in the Finance Committee has something to hide. Why is Senator Ryan  protecting a Government Agency when he is aware to the gross misconduct occurring? What has Senator Ryan  got to gain from  this??

EMAIL SENT TO SENATOR RYAN  22.09.2011
: Dear Senator,
I confirm I rang your office yesterday. I understand you chair a committee at Estimates.
Please excuse some of my ignorance as I am a florist so I fail to understand a lot of processes in Parliament.
I have evidence of what is occuring a ITSA( Bankruptcy). Any inquiry or committee looking into the Bankruptcy Act is wasting their time unless you understand what is occurring at the very core of ITSA. Never , ever will anyone extract what is being advised by the Principal Legal Officer in Canberra.
Itsa is using S134(3) to justify and misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act.This section actually reffers to property, however ITSA is using it out of context and applying it to the entire Act.
The problem is not with the Act it is how it is being implemented and manipulated by Senior Management. Any complaints are covered up by Bankruptcy Regulation. They are using s134(3) to justify everything. This section refers only to property and the discretion that a trusttee has. Itsa is taking it to a new level and apply discretion to the entire Act. This is why there are so few people prosecuted under the Bankruptcy Act because Itsa are not referring them because are using this section to breach the Bankruptcy Act. This section is also used for senior Management to mislead creditors and assist bankrupts to fail to meet their obligations under the Bankruptcy Act. This opens whole field for corruption.
Any complaints are being covered up by Bankruptcy Regulations ,so instead of things ever improving they are infact becoming worse. The commonwealth Ombudsman only investigating 20% of complaints about ITSA. There will never be transperency while this section is being used.
I have had a quick look at ASIC and I can see a mine field there also.
As I already have said I am only a florist but I have had advice by the solicitors at the Sydney Markets what questions to ask and how to collect and confirm all my evidence.
To improve the Bankruptcy Act Bankruptcy Regulations must be removed, never ever will they tell any inquiry what is happening. They have covered up too much over the years and to admit any liability would have a cause extreme embarrassement.
I am sure ASIC would be using a similar clause to justify misconduct and breaches of the Act that they administer.
Thnking you for reading this,
Fiona Brown