Email to Prime Minister and Cabinet RE Alison Larkins

RE: Commonwealth Ombudsman position‏

12:21 PM

Reply  ▼

• Reply
• .

To renee.leon@pmc.gov.au

From:	fiona brown (fionabrown01@hotmail.com)
Sent:	Sunday, 5 February 2012 12:21:13 PM
To:	renee.leon@pmc.gov.au

Hi Renee,
I am just following up on my request for the contact details of the person or people that are considering the applications for the position of Commonwealth Ombudsman . I am sure you are aware Alison Larkins has been referred to the Australian Public Service Commission for covering up systemic corrupt conduct at the  Insolvency Trustee Service Australia. This is the Government Agency that regulates the bankruptcy Act.
I am certain that Steve Sedgwick the APS Commissioner will attempt to cover this up, so I am asking that I be given the details .
If you can supply me with an email that will be satisfactory.
Thanking you
Fiona Brown

How will the APS Commission Cover this up and why the Commonwealth Ombudsman covers up for Government Agencies

If anyone has  a complaint about a Government Agency and brings it to the attention of the relevant Minister, Prime Minister or Treasury just expect nothing will be done.
The Government will not deal with these matters because   the liability is enormous.
I have a fucking load of letters of one department referring a  problem to the other.
The funniest of the the all is when you are referred to the Commonwealth Ombudsman.
The Commonwealth Ombudsman  will not expose systemic corruption or any other  similar complaint because it will expose the Government to enormous liability.
 So, my advice is to those who read this in Australia and those who are reading this in America, never ever speak to the Ombudsman on the telephone. Always , Always correspond by email so you have the evidence that they cannot deny.
Now the matter has been referred to the APS Commission and the APS Commissioner Steve Sedgewick.
How  will they try and cover this up?? I have it all in writing  from the Commonwealth Ombudsman Steve. What deal will you do to make this go away.???
Why did the dumb fucks at the Commonwealth Ombudsman attempt to cover it up when they already were aware of the extensive evidence that I had on ITSA.
Is there more than systemic corrupt conduct at ITSA????   Is there actual corruption  at ITSA that Senior Management is involved in and the Commonwealth Ombudsman is protecting??? Are Trustee's profiting from using S134(3)???? Mathew Osborne's advice to trustee's to use this section to breach the Bankruptcy Act has not been disciplined by Veronique Ingram. Why not???

How will Steve Sedgewick cover this one up????

How will Steve Sedgewick coverup this one for the APS????

---

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: gary.gray.mp@aph.gov.au
Subject: Systemic corrupt Conduct
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:50:46 +1100

Dear Mr Gray,
I refer to the email I received from you on the 9th December 2011 which is 2 months ago.
I understand you are the Minister for the Public Service and Integrity.
I  brought the matter of the Head of ITSA failing  her responsibility and  failing to discipline Systemic Corrupt Conduct by Senior Management. This conduct was instigated by the Principal Legal Officer.
This  evidence was given to the Commonwealth Ombudsman. Alison Larkins acting Commonwealth Ombudsman is aware of it.
According to the Commonwealth Ombudsman's Act S15 this behaviour should have been brought to the attention of the Attorney General, however the Commonwealth Ombudsman instead covered this up and put  no action in place that this would not occur again in the future.
You will be aware the Commonwealth Ombudsman's position  has been advertised and the applicants are now being considered. I am sure it would be ethical of you to notify the appropriate people that Alison Larkins in unfit to be considered. In fact she is unfit also to hold the position of deputy Commonwealth Ombudsman.
 Both Veronique Ingram and Alison Larkins have wasted considerable recourses attempting to cover this up. To expose this is in the public interest.
I am now extremely concerned that the Australian Public Service Commission  will also cover this up.  
My evidence of Systemic Corrupt Conduct at ITSA is considerable.
I only communicated with the Commonwealth Ombudsman by email so I have this as my evidence. The is no possibility that the Commonwealth Ombudsman misunderstood my evidence. This shows  an absolute breakdown of Integrity at ITSA and the Commonwealth Ombudsman. Both Alison Larkins and Veronique Ingram are unfit to hold these positions.
I beleive Steve Sedgewick will also attempt to cover this up.
Please ensure this does not occur.
Thank You
Fiona Brown

Posted 6 hours ago by bankruptcy coverup by ombudsman

COMMONWEALTH OMBUSDSMAN MISCONDUCT

Mathew Osborne Principal Legal Officer at ITSA is telling staff at ITSA that S134(3) allows them to breach the Bankruptcy Act.
Donkey.. it only applies to property not the entire Act........... WHAT the F..K... he never thought he would get caught!!!
Why is Veronique Ingram Inspector General  covering for him???????????
Why is Robert McClelland the Attorney General covering for Veronique Ingram????
What are they all hiding?????

Commonwealth Ombudsman/Commonwealth Ombudsman Scam

Alison Larkins is unfit to hold the position of Commonwealth Ombudsman. Why is she concealing misconduct in Government departments????

Julie Padgett NSW Manager BFI

 JULIE PADGETT/NSW BFI Manager ITSA

  So now you can read about yourself and the scam at ITSA... Remember you idiot, I have all my evidence in writing.
Did you think all my conversations with you were just polite ... you stupid fool........... I was told to get the necessary evidence on you by the solicitors.

Section 19 of the Bankruptcy Act says

(i)  referring to the Inspector-General or to relevant law enforcement authorities any evidence of an offence by the bankrupt against this Act; Refer to  Inspector Generals Practice statement 14 Failure to refer is a breach of the Bankruptcy Act. I don't give a F..K  that the principal Legal Officer Mathew Osborne is telling you to breach it using S134(3) This only refers to property you arrogant donkey!!!! misconduct at ITSA: misconduct at ITSA 19 Sep 2011 ... misconduct at ITSA That's why there are so few referred for prosecution..... good on Ya Julie Padgett.... you know how to assist bankrupts! ... misconductatitsa.blogspot.com/2011/09/misconduct-at-itsa_19.html - Cached - Similar

itsa.itsa: September 2011 30 Sep 2011 ... misconduct at ITSA. So Julie Padgett Manager BFI does not refer Bankrupts to Enforcement because Mattew Osborne told her she can breach the ... itsaitsa.blogspot.com/2011_09_01_archive.html - Cached - Similar

http://twitter.com/fiona_up/ Choo Julie Padgett, Cheryl Cullen, Adam Toma, Giulia Inga, Mathew Osbourne ... order so the story of abuse and misconduct at ITSA.. about 1 hour ago via web ... twitter.com/fiona_up/ - Cached - Similar

itsa.itsa: Itsa Scam 14 Sep 2011 ... What is the scam going on at ITSA by Julie Padgett??? Posted by bankruptcy coverup by ombudsman at 17:02 · Email This BlogThis! ... itsaitsa.blogspot.com/2011/09/itsa-scam_8981.html - Cached - Similar itsa.itsa: Itsa Scam 14 Sep 2011 ... Itsa Scam. Why is the Commonwealth Ombudsman covering up the Scam at Itsa by Mark Findlay and Julie Padgett?? Posted by bankruptcy coverup ... itsaitsa.blogspot.com/2011/09/itsa-scam.html - Cached - Similar

BANKRUPTCY REGULATIONS

Why is the Commonwealth Ombudsman covering up the misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act at ITSA??? You idiots ... ITSA cannot use section 134(3) to justify misconduct and breaches of the Bankruptcy Act....
Why do we have a donkey as head of the Commonwealth Ombudsman anyway?????

BANKRUPTCY ACT 1966 - SECT 134

Powers exercisable at discretion of trustee [see Table B]

             (1)  Subject to this Act, the trustee may do all or any of the following things:

                     (a)  sell all or any part of the property of the bankrupt;

                    (aa)  accept, without terms or conditions, or subject to terms and conditions, a sum of money payable at a future time as the consideration or part of the consideration for the sale of any property of the bankrupt;

                   (ab)  lease any property of the bankrupt;

                    (ac)  divide among the creditors, in its existing form and according to its estimated value, property that, by reason of its peculiar nature or other special circumstances, cannot readily or advantageously be sold;

                     (b)  carry on a business of the bankrupt so far as may be necessary to dispose of it or wind it up for the benefit of creditors;

                     (c)  postpone the winding-up of the estate;

                     (d)  prove in respect of any debt due to the bankrupt;

                   (da)  mortgage or charge any of the property of the bankrupt for the purpose of raising money for the payment of the debts provable in the bankruptcy;

                     (e)  compromise any debt claimed to be due to the bankrupt or any claim by the bankrupt;

                      (f)  make a compromise with a creditor or a person claiming to be a creditor in respect of a debt provable, or claimed to be provable, in the bankruptcy;

                     (g)  make a compromise in respect of any claim arising out of the administration of the estate of the bankrupt, whether the claim is made by or against the trustee;

                     (h)  deal with property to which the bankrupt is beneficially entitled as tenant in tail in the same manner as the bankrupt could deal with it if he or she were not a bankrupt;

                      (i)  obtain such advice or assistance as he or she considers desirable relating to the administration of the estate or to the conduct or affairs of the bankrupt;

                    (ia)  refer any dispute to arbitration;

                      (j)  bring, institute or defend any action or other legal proceeding relating to the administration of the estate;

                     (k)  execute powers of attorney, deeds or other instruments for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this Act into effect; and

                    (m)  employ the bankrupt:

                              (i)  to superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;

                             (ii)  to carry on the bankrupt's trade or business for the benefit of the bankrupt's creditors; or

                            (iii)  to assist in any other way in administering the property of the bankrupt;

                            and, in consideration of the bankrupt's services, make such allowance to the bankrupt out of the estate as the trustee considers reasonable;

                  (ma)  make such allowance out of the estate as he or she thinks just to the bankrupt, the spouse or de facto partner of the bankrupt or the family of the bankrupt;

Note:       See also subsection 5(6).

                     (n)  superintend the management of the whole, or a part, of the property of the bankrupt;

                     (o)  administer the property of the bankrupt in any other way.

          (1A)  An allowance made to the bankrupt in pursuance of paragraph (1)(m) may be reduced by the Court upon the application of an interested person.

             (3)  Subject to this Act, the trustee may use his or her own discretion in the administration of the estate.

             (4)  The trustee may at any time apply to the Court for directions in respect of a matter arising in connexion with the administration of the estate.

Note:          Section 178 allows an application to be made to the Court by the bankrupt, a creditor or any other person who is affected by an act, omission or decision of the trustee.